Session 10 included: Content of EBPs (i.e. The webinar then focused on Session 10: Framing Viable Policy Options to Address a Problem: A Step-by-Step Guide presented by EVIPNet-K2P Center. The introduction to the webinar provided: an Overview of methodologies to measure antibiotic use, and the use of surveillance data the link between AMR and use of antimicrobials and the integrated national action needed on optimal use of antimicrobials, including through data, surveillance, and monitoring. Frame the problem statement and underlying causes for your selected priority topic/area.The preparatory work outlined in Webinar 4 was to: The webinar ended with Group work – using the EBP template – based upon Sessions 11 and 12. Group or individual work with support from EVIPNet/K2P To coordinate with assigned team lead for each country team To agree on preliminary timeline for the updated policy brief outlines The session also covered: stake- holder selection framework for litmus testing, and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders. Session 12: Overview of EBP outline (and semi-structured interviews/litmus) including: the policy brief outline, e.g., identification of how the problem related to risk factors/disease, to a program or service, and/or to the current health system viable policy or programmatic options to address the problem and potential barriers that could influence implementation policy options.
‘top-down’ and ‘Bottom-up’) identifying and addressing barriers to implementing policies health system, and social and political constraints and tips on developing the implementation considerations. Session 11 included: approaches to policy implementation (i.e. Session 11: Identifying Key Implementation Considerations Framing presented by EVIPNet-K2P Center. The refresher session finished with ‘Case examples’. Webinar 6 provided a ‘ Refresher: from problem statement to policy options‘ on the content of Evidence-to-Policy Briefs (EBP) including the problem statement, options and elements, and implementation considerations framing the problem, clarifying its underlying causes, the appropriate types of evidence to use in framing problems, and framing, developing, and expanding on the options/ elements to address the problem. Stakeholder selection, i.e., degree of involvement in/knowledge about the issue and relevant solutions ability to constructively engage in discussions ability to take forward recommended actions within respective constituencies and the importance of the dialogue facilitator’s role.ĭialogue summary, i.e., tools to outline the results of the discussions during the policy dialogue and post-dialogue summaries.įeedback from country teams on progress to date (10 minutes per team) Preparation for policy dialogues, i.e., informed by pre-circulated evidence on the policy issue. Webinar Session 13: Organizing a policy dialogue presented by EVIPNet-K2P Center, focusing on how policy dialogues influence the use of evidence in health policy and decision-making including:Ĭonsiderations for conducting policy dialogues, i.e., does the dialogue address a high priority issue? Does it provide opportunities to discuss/address the issue, and considerations for implementation? Is there fair representation among those involved in/affected by future decisions related to the issue? Are follow-up activities undertaken to support action? Uganda, Malawi, Nepal briefly shared progress and EVIPNet/K2P team commented on the progress. Select key relevant stakeholders for semi-structured interviews/litmus testingįeedback from country teams on preparatory work/progress to date:.Identify implementation considerations for policy options.
0 kommentar(er)
